Ethical Clearance
Research Involving Human Participants
Papers submitted to Physical Education and Sports: Studies and Research (PESSR) that involve human participants must comply with internationally recognized ethical principles for research involving humans.
Authors must ensure that:
-
the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/);
-
the research protocol received approval from an appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB), Research Ethics Committee (REC), or equivalent ethics committee before the study commenced;
-
all participants voluntarily provided informed consent prior to participation; and
-
for participants who are minors or otherwise unable to provide legal consent, written informed consent was obtained from a parent, legal guardian, or other legally authorized representative.
Authors should report the name of the approving ethics committee, approval number (where applicable), and approval date within the manuscript.
Privacy and Confidentiality
Participants have the right to privacy and confidentiality. Personally identifiable information, including names, photographs, videos, or other identifying characteristics, must not be published unless essential for scientific purposes and explicit written permission has been obtained.
Authors must not manipulate, alter, or falsify participant information in an attempt to achieve anonymity. When complete anonymity cannot be guaranteed, explicit written consent for publication must be obtained.
Ethical Approval Statement
All manuscripts reporting research involving human participants must include an Ethical Approval Statement describing:
-
the approving ethics committee;
-
approval number and date (where applicable);
-
confirmation that informed consent was obtained; and
-
confirmation that the study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable national or institutional regulations.
Failure to provide appropriate ethical approval may result in rejection of the manuscript.
Publication Ethics and Editorial Standards
PESSR follows internationally recognized principles of publication ethics and editorial integrity. Authors are expected to comply with the recommendations and best practices developed by the following organizations:
-
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) – Core Practices: https://publicationethics.org/core-practices
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) – Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
-
World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) – Recommendations on Publication Ethics: https://wame.org/
-
World Medical Association – Declaration of Helsinki: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose any financial, personal, institutional, or other relationships that could be perceived as influencing the research, its interpretation, or publication. All sources of funding and financial support must also be clearly stated in the manuscript.
Corrections and Retractions
If authors identify a significant error or inaccuracy in a published article, they are expected to notify the Editorial Office promptly and cooperate fully in issuing a correction, retraction, or other appropriate editorial action. PESSR manages post-publication corrections in accordance with the principles and guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
COPE resources
- Ethical oversight — COPE (overview of policies and expectations)
- Ensuring consent for publishing medical case reports — COPE guideline
- Develop processes to help identify ethical concerns — COPE (Ethics toolkit)
- Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office — COPE (PDF)
- Lack of trial registration — COPE
- Ethical approval for a study — COPE case
- Case report and consent — COPE case
- Confidentiality and consent in case reports — COPE case
- Permission to publish a case report — COPE case
- Inadequate assurance of human research ethics (questionnaire) — COPE case
- An unethical ethics committee? — COPE case
- Low-risk study with no ethics committee approval — COPE case discussion












